Final Fantasy Type-0 HD

The opinions of the critics regarding the story of Final Fantasy Type-0 HD are quite varied. Some critics, such as Attack of the Fanboy and GamesRadar+, praise the story for its gripping war narrative and mature themes of betrayal and loss. These critics appreciate the darker and more adult experience offered by the game compared to previous Final Fantasy titles. The story is described as a high-quality tale with mystery and emotional struggles, raising questions about mortality and memory. The exploration of common topics with depth and philosophical undertones is also highlighted by PlayStation Universe. These positive reviews suggest that the story of Final Fantasy Type-0 HD successfully engages players with its compelling narrative. However, there are also several negative opinions regarding the story. CGMagazine criticizes it for feeling distant and cold, with cryptic storytelling and an overwhelming amount of proper nouns and indecipherable mantras. Gaming Age mentions that the story feels disjointed and lacks balance between school and combat, with uneven storytelling and tonal shifts in cutscenes. Game Informer criticizes the story for becoming disconnected and overwhelmed by non-sequiturs, with stilted and melodramatic conversations. Impulsegamer criticizes the story for being convoluted and filled with confusing terms and concepts, as well as the lack of growth and development for the characters. These negative reviews suggest that the story of Final Fantasy Type-0 HD may suffer from confusing storytelling, uneven pacing, and underdeveloped characters. Overall, the consensus among the critics is mixed. While some critics appreciate the dark and compelling narrative, others criticize the confusing storytelling, lack of character development, and uneven pacing. The positive reviews highlight the mature and well-written aspects of the story, while the negative reviews emphasize the issues with storytelling and character growth. It is worth noting that some critics, such as IGN and Official Xbox Magazine UK, mention the cringe-worthy voice acting as a drawback. The overall sentiment leans towards a more critical view of the story, with a need for improvement in terms of narrative coherence, character development, and voice acting.

The opinions of the critics regarding the gameplay of Final Fantasy Type-0 HD are generally positive, with a focus on the combat system. Many critics praise the combat for being fast-paced, action-based, and engaging. They highlight the diverse and unique characters, each with their own combat style and abilities, as a positive aspect of the gameplay. The ability to switch between squadmates and the importance of proper spacing and character improvement are also mentioned as positive features. Critics such as DarkZero, Official Xbox Magazine UK, and PlayStation Universe specifically mention the complexity and depth of the combat system, with skill and timing playing a crucial role. The combat is described as satisfying, intuitive, and offering a variety of playstyles. However, there are some negative aspects of the gameplay that critics point out. Some reviewers mention outdated elements and boredom in the gameplay. Gameplanet describes the gameplay as rote, dull, and a combination of the worst bits of action-adventure and RPG. Game Informer criticizes the battles for being defined by button-mashing rather than clear strategy, with a lack of telegraphed enemy attacks making battles frantic. IGN Italia mentions that ignoring time management and exploration aspects may result in under-leveled characters. Shacknews highlights sharp difficulty spikes and the need for grinding to level up characters as negative aspects of the gameplay. Overall, the consensus among the critics is that the combat system is the standout aspect of the gameplay in Final Fantasy Type-0 HD. The fast-paced, action-based combat, along with the diverse characters and their unique abilities, provide an engaging and satisfying experience. The complexity and depth of the combat system are praised, as well as the ability to switch between squadmates and the importance of character improvement. However, there are some criticisms regarding outdated elements, boredom, button-mashing battles, and difficulty spikes. Despite these negatives, the positive aspects of the gameplay seem to outweigh the negatives, making Final Fantasy Type-0 HD an enjoyable experience for fans of action-based combat and the Final Fantasy franchise.

In analyzing the opinions of multiple reviewers regarding the Graphics and Visual Design of Final Fantasy Type-0 HD, it is clear that there is a mixed reception. Some critics highlight positive aspects of the graphics, such as improved character models and striking visuals. Attack of the Fanboy mentions that the game consistently impresses throughout with its upgraded visuals, while Impulsegamer notes that when the game uses color, it looks beautiful. Additionally, Critical Hit praises the cutscenes for their fantastic visuals. However, the majority of critics express negative opinions about the graphics and visual design of Final Fantasy Type-0 HD. CGMagazine criticizes the flat and static environments, stating that they feel at odds with the updated character designs. Gaming Age describes the game as feeling cramped and claustrophobic, with noticeable low-poly models and low-res textures. IGN Italia points out that the HD porting could have been better, as the game was originally developed for mobile and then ported to PSP and PS4. Many critics, including DarkZero, Gaming Nexus, and Gameplanet, mention issues such as jarring transitions, repeated textures, and low-detailed environments. Overall, the consensus among the critics is that the graphics and visual design of Final Fantasy Type-0 HD are underwhelming. The game is criticized for its outdated textures, low-poly character models, and bland environments. Critics such as Polygon and Shacknews specifically highlight the weak graphics and visual design for an HD remaster. While there are some positive aspects mentioned, such as improved character models and striking visuals, the negative opinions outweigh the positive ones. The general sentiment is that the game falls short in terms of graphics and visual design, with many critics expressing disappointment in the overall graphical quality.

The opinions of the critics regarding the Sound Design and Music of Final Fantasy Type-0 HD are quite varied. Attack of the Fanboy praises the game for its beautifully orchestrated soundtrack that perfectly fits with the dark and militaristic setting. This positive feedback highlights the immersive audio experience that the updated hardware allows for. Destructoid also commends the game's soundtrack, describing it as incredible. The focus on red and gold in the aesthetics is visually appealing, creating a strong audio-visual experience for players. TheSixthAxis acknowledges the impressive feat of having fully English-voiced audio, which adds to the overall immersion of the game. On the other hand, several critics express negative opinions about the voice acting and dialogue. CGMagazine and ZTGD both criticize the voice acting, with CGMagazine describing it as dismal and ZTGD going as far as calling it atrocious. Both critics also mention that the dialogue ruins the experience, indicating that the poor voice acting and dialogue negatively impact the overall sound design of the game. Gameplanet's review does not mention anything about the music or sound design, suggesting that it may not have left a significant impression on the reviewer. Overall, the consensus among the critics is mixed. While there is praise for the soundtrack and the immersive audio experience created by the updated hardware, the negative opinions regarding the voice acting and dialogue cannot be ignored. The critics' comments highlight the importance of strong voice acting and well-written dialogue in enhancing the overall sound design of a game. Despite some positive aspects, the negative feedback regarding the voice acting and dialogue may overshadow the overall sentiment towards the Sound Design and Music of Final Fantasy Type-0 HD.

The opinions of the critics regarding the voice acting of Final Fantasy Type-0 HD are quite divided. Some critics, such as Destructoid and We Got This Covered, have positive views on the voice acting. Destructoid praises the seasoned dub cast, led by talents like Matthew Mercer, for doing a great job. We Got This Covered also finds the voice acting solid. These positive opinions highlight the efforts put into the voice performances by the cast. On the other hand, several critics express negative views on the voice acting. CGMagazine describes it as dismal, IGN mentions cringe-worthy moments, and Official Xbox Magazine UK describes it as flat. Gameplanet goes as far as calling it dire, lacking enthusiasm. These negative opinions emphasize the overall disappointment with the quality of the voice acting in the game. The overall consensus among the critics leans towards a negative perception of the voice acting in Final Fantasy Type-0 HD. Critics like IGN, GamesRadar+, and Gaming Nexus criticize the English voice acting for being flat, awkward, and not well-synced with the conversational cinemas. The sub-standard script and voiceovers are also mentioned by Metro GameCentral. While there are a few positive opinions, the majority of critics express disappointment with the voice acting, highlighting issues such as cringe-worthy moments, lack of enthusiasm, and poor synchronization. The availability of the option to choose between English or Japanese voice-overs, as mentioned by Attack of the Fanboy, is seen as a positive aspect that caters to different gamer preferences. Overall, the voice acting in Final Fantasy Type-0 HD seems to have fallen short of expectations and failed to deliver a consistently satisfying experience for the critics.

In terms of the PC version, DarkZero and Gaming Age both highlight some positive aspects of the technical performance. DarkZero mentions improvements such as the removal of motion blur, while Gaming Age praises the smooth performance at 1080p. These positive aspects indicate that the PC version has some enhancements that contribute to a better gaming experience. However, RPG Fan points out some negative aspects of the PC version's technical performance. They mention that while there are PC-specific options and Steam Cloud saving, the implementation of these options can be obtuse, and the mouse/keyboard controls are weak. This suggests that there are still some areas for improvement in terms of the PC version's technical performance. Moving on to the console versions, IGN's review of the Xbox One version mentions mechanical issues inherited from the original PSP version, including a stubborn camera and clunky controls. Similarly, IGN's review of the PS4 version also highlights these mechanical issues. Game Informer adds to the negative feedback by mentioning muddy textures, frequent loading, and finicky camera rotation in the PS4 version. Metro GameCentral also points out that the camera hasn't been properly updated from the PSP, further indicating technical issues in the PS4 version. PlayStation Universe mentions visual performance issues with motion blur and janky camera lock against fast opponents in the PS4 version. We Got This Covered adds that the motion blur filter can be disorienting and there is no way to disable it. Additionally, Impulsegamer criticizes the lack of autosave and unexpected difficulty spikes in the PS4 version. games(TM) also mentions a temperamental and 'jolty' camera, as well as the inability to tweak ally AI in the PS4 version. Overall, the consensus among the critics is that the technical performance of Final Fantasy Type-0 HD has some shortcomings across all gaming platforms. Issues such as mechanical problems, camera difficulties, and motion blur are mentioned consistently by multiple critics. However, there are some positive aspects, such as improvements in the PC version and stable performance overall in the PS4 version. Despite these positives, the negative aspects of the technical performance seem to outweigh the positives, indicating that there is room for improvement in the game's technical performance across all platforms.

In analyzing the opinions of the critics regarding the replay value of Final Fantasy Type-0 HD, it is evident that there are both positive and negative aspects to consider. Several critics, such as Attack of the Fanboy and PlayStation Universe, highlight the game's intriguing story, action-oriented gameplay, and the encouragement to experiment with different characters and party setups, which contribute to an enjoyable replay experience. Additionally, Critical Hit and Destructoid mention the presence of multiple difficulty ranges and the ability to replay specific missions, providing ample replay value for players seeking a challenge or a different approach. On the other hand, there are critics who express concerns about the game's replayability. CGMagazine and ActionTrip criticize the tedious and unrewarding nature of the story, with the latter also highlighting forced grinding and exploration. RPG Fan and Gameplanet mention the potential for gems and additional content in subsequent playthroughs, but express doubt about personally discovering them. Furthermore, Metro GameCentral suggests that the game may not have universal appeal, implying a lack of replay value for some players. Overall, the consensus among the critics leans towards a positive assessment of the replay value in Final Fantasy Type-0 HD. The game's variety in gameplay, the ability to replay missions, and the presence of additional story and mission content are frequently mentioned as factors that contribute to its replayability. However, there are concerns about the tediousness of certain aspects, such as the story and grinding, which may deter some players from engaging in multiple playthroughs. Despite these criticisms, the majority of critics acknowledge the game's potential for replay value, making it a worthwhile experience for fans of the genre.