God Eater 3

The opinions of the critics regarding the story of God Eater 3 are quite varied. Some critics, such as Nintendo Insider and TheSixthAxis, find the story intriguing and interesting, with a post-apocalyptic setting and a narrative that expands through additional information discovered in the game. These critics appreciate the world-building and the engaging storyline. Additionally, Daily Star and Game Rant mention that the story revolves around themes of freedom and family, which they find heart-warming and entertaining. On the other hand, several critics express negative opinions about the story of God Eater 3. COGconnected, NintendoWorldReport, and Impulsegamer criticize the story for being confusing, lacking explanation, and relying heavily on dialogue. They feel that the story is impenetrable for newcomers and lacks depth or exploration of themes. DualShockers and RPG Site also mention that the attempts to evoke emotions in the story are ineffective and forgettable. Game Revolution and Metro GameCentral go even further, describing the story as dull, frustrating, clichéd, and predictable. Overall, the consensus among the critics is mixed. While some critics appreciate the intriguing setting, engaging narrative, and heart-warming themes of freedom and family, others find the story confusing, lacking depth, and clichéd. Critics such as GameSpew and The Overpowered Noobs mention that the story is not a strong point of the game, but it is tolerable and enjoyable enough to complement the action. The Digital Fix and Push Square highlight that while the story may not be groundbreaking, it still manages to entertain and engage players, especially those familiar with anime tropes. Ultimately, the story of God Eater 3 seems to be a subjective aspect of the game, with some critics finding it enjoyable and others feeling underwhelmed by its execution.

The opinions of the critics regarding the gameplay of God Eater 3 are generally positive. Many critics praise the combat, describing it as enjoyable, entertaining, and fast-paced. They appreciate the variety of weapons and customization options available, allowing players to tailor their playstyle. Critics such as Daily Star and CGMagazine highlight the fluid movement and deep combat system, which is both accessible for newcomers and satisfying for experienced players. The ability to switch between melee and ranged attacks is also mentioned as a fun aspect of the gameplay. The combat mechanics are well-explained, and the AI companions provide solid support during battles, as mentioned by TheSixthAxis. However, there are some negative aspects mentioned by critics. Several critics, including NintendoWorldReport and Game Revolution, express concerns about the repetitive nature of the gameplay loop. They mention that the core gameplay can feel monotonous and lacking in depth, especially when compared to similar titles like Monster Hunter. Some critics, such as Impulsegamer and Metro GameCentral, point out issues with the controls, describing them as convoluted, fiddly, and confusing. The limited ammo in gun mode and the lack of enemy health bars are also mentioned as frustrating elements by Press Start Australia. Overall, the consensus among the critics is that God Eater 3 offers solid and enjoyable gameplay. The combat is often praised for its fast-paced nature, deep customization options, and varied playstyles. The ability to upgrade and craft gear, as well as the inclusion of Burst Arts and the Engage system, adds depth to the gameplay experience. However, some critics express concerns about the repetitive mission design, lack of innovation, and issues with controls. Despite these criticisms, the overall sentiment is positive, with critics appreciating the game's combat mechanics and customization options.

The opinions of the critics regarding the graphics and visual design of God Eater 3 are varied. Some critics, such as COGconnected and The Overpowered Noobs, praise the game for its slick and unique look, with distinctive anime-style visuals. The character designs and animations during combat are also highlighted as positives by critics like RPG Site and The Digital Fix. Additionally, Press Start Australia commends the game for its polished visuals, including 3D cel-shaded graphics, brilliant colors, and glowing effects. The beautifully animated intro and challenging monster designs are also mentioned as positives by Screen Rant. However, there are several criticisms regarding the graphics and visual design of God Eater 3. Daily Star and GameSpace mention graphical shortcomings, including blurrier environments and a lack of upgrades in the visuals and user interface. Game Revolution and DualShockers criticize the repetitive and lacking variety of the environmental assets, as well as the reuse of maps, leading to a sense of grind and lack of interest. Metro GameCentral describes the graphics as sub-par, and Push Square mentions that the visuals are horribly outdated, with cumbersome menus. Overall, the consensus among the critics is mixed. While there are positive aspects of the graphics and visual design, such as the distinctive anime style and polished visuals, there are also notable negatives, including graphical shortcomings, repetitive environments, and outdated visuals. Some critics, like PlayStation Universe and The Digital Fix, highlight improvements in character models and lighting effects, while others, like Push Square and RPG Site, criticize the still and dull animations in combat and cutscenes. It is clear that the visuals of God Eater 3 have received both praise and criticism, with a range of opinions on the overall quality of the graphics and visual design.

The opinions of the critics regarding the Sound Design and Music of God Eater 3 are quite varied. Some critics, such as Daily Star and PlayStation Universe, praise the sound design and music of the game. Daily Star describes the sound design as excellent, highlighting the echoing character voices in indoor environments. PlayStation Universe also mentions the epic music in the game and considers the voice acting to be quite good. These positive opinions suggest that the sound design and music are strong aspects of God Eater 3. However, there are also negative opinions regarding the sound design and voice acting. NintendoWorldReport criticizes the voice acting, describing it as oddly poor, and mentions that the dodgy localization detracts from the cutscenes. CGMagazine points out that the character models' mouth movements rarely match up with the English audio, which can be immersion-breaking. Impulsegamer also mentions the lack of real vocal recording, which affects the overall immersion. These negative opinions highlight some flaws in the sound design and voice acting of the game. Overall, the consensus among the critics is mixed. While there are positive opinions regarding the sound design, music, and voice acting, there are also criticisms regarding the voice acting quality, localization, and lip syncing. Press Start Australia mentions that the soundtrack is great and the voice acting doesn't make the reviewer cringe, but the dialogue could use some work. RPG Site describes the soundtrack as over-the-top and exciting, but considers the English voice acting to be just okay. The availability of both English and Japanese audio options is mentioned positively by CGMagazine and RPG Site. Taking into account these varied opinions, it can be concluded that while the sound design and music of God Eater 3 have their strengths, there are also areas that could be improved upon to provide a more immersive and cohesive audio experience.

The opinions of the critics regarding the voice acting in God Eater 3 are quite varied. Some critics, such as Daily Star and PlayStation Universe, have positive views on the voice acting. Daily Star describes the Japanese voice acting as superb, while PlayStation Universe states that the voice acting in the game is quite good. These positive opinions suggest that the voice acting successfully enhances the overall experience of the game for these critics. On the other hand, there are critics who express negative views on the voice acting in God Eater 3. NintendoWorldReport criticizes the voice acting, describing it as oddly poor and detracting from the cutscenes. Gaming Age also shares a negative opinion, stating that the voice acting is lackluster. These negative opinions indicate that the voice acting fails to meet the expectations of these critics and may even diminish their enjoyment of the game. Despite the mixed opinions, there seems to be a general consensus among the critics that the voice acting in God Eater 3 is not exceptional. CGMagazine mentions that the game includes both English and Japanese audio, allowing players to choose their preferred language. This suggests that the option to switch to Japanese voices may be a preferable alternative for some players. RPG Site also mentions that the English voice acting is considered just okay, further supporting the notion that it may not be on par with the highest standards. Overall, while there are some positive opinions, the general sentiment leans towards the voice acting being average or below average in God Eater 3.

The critics have generally positive opinions regarding the technical performance of God Eater 3 on the Nintendo Switch. Daily Star states that the game runs well on the Switch, with the main concessions found in textures and the lower resolution. GameSpew also mentions that the game runs well on the Switch with no performance issues during combat. Nintendo Life adds that the game runs well on the Nintendo Switch, with only a few brief moments of slowdown experienced during online play. These positive opinions highlight that the game is generally optimized for the Switch, providing a smooth and enjoyable gaming experience. However, on the PlayStation 4, there are some negative aspects mentioned by the critics. CGMagazine notes that the game suffers from slowdown when there are too many Aragami onscreen at once. Gamers Heroes mentions longer loading times and camera issues with fast-moving Aragami. Push Square reports connection errors when playing online with strangers. RPG Site criticizes the clunky animations and still, dull cutscenes. These negative aspects indicate that the game's technical performance on the PS4 could be improved, particularly in terms of optimizing the gameplay experience during intense moments and addressing technical issues in online play. Overall, the consensus among the critics is that God Eater 3 performs well on the Nintendo Switch, with only minor concessions in terms of textures and resolution. However, on the PlayStation 4, there are some technical issues such as slowdown, longer loading times, camera issues, and connection errors. Despite these negatives, the game generally runs fine on the PS4. The critics' opinions highlight that while the technical performance may have some flaws, the overall gameplay experience is enjoyable on both platforms.

The critics generally agree that God Eater 3 offers a good amount of replay value. Many of them highlight the game's depth and content, with Daily Star mentioning the ability to play for hours and earn upgrades. GameSpew also notes that the game becomes more enjoyable after finishing the story, encouraging players to push themselves and develop their characters further. Nintendo Life praises the inclusion of local co-op, which is seen as a real boon for Nintendo Switch owners. RPG Site adds that the wide variety of systems and options for customization and upgrading, including different weapon types and new skills, provide exciting new options for loadout customization. The multiplayer option and the ability to play missions with NPCs also contribute to the replay value, according to RPG Site. However, there are some negative aspects mentioned by the critics. Nintendo Insider points out that the high encounter rate in the game may feel repetitious during long play sessions. CGMagazine mentions that the early stages of the game can become too easy and some missions can feel repetitive. Video Chums also criticizes the short and repetitive missions, which can make the game feel like a chore after a while. Metro GameCentral states that the game lacks variety in gameplay, enemy design, and mission design. Overall, the critics' consensus is that God Eater 3 offers a decent amount of replay value. The game's depth, content, and customization options are praised by multiple critics, including Daily Star, GameSpew, and RPG Site. The inclusion of co-op and multiplayer options, as well as the ability to earn skills during assault missions that can be used in the campaign, are also seen as positives by critics such as We Got This Covered. However, there are criticisms regarding the repetitiveness of missions and lack of variety in gameplay and mission design, as mentioned by CGMagazine, Video Chums, and Metro GameCentral. Despite these negatives, the overall sentiment is that God Eater 3 offers enough replay value to keep players engaged and entertained.