Marvel vs. Capcom: Infinite

The opinions on the story of Marvel vs. Capcom: Infinite are quite diverse, with some critics highlighting positive aspects. COGconnected praises the story mode for tying everything together well, surprising with unexpected twists, and providing equal screen time to over 30 characters. They also mention impressive writing and a post-credits scene that sets up the next chapter effectively. Additionally, Digital Trends appreciates the raucous fan service in the campaign, offering a goofy romp through the best set pieces of both universes. Everyeye.it finds the substantial story mode introducing Ultron Sigma as the main villain and incorporating elements from Marvel Super Heroes to be a positive aspect. On the negative side, several critics express disappointment with the story mode of Marvel vs. Capcom: Infinite. Arcade Sushi criticizes the lack of humor and serious tone, with bad one-liners and awkward jokes falling flat. Cubed3 describes the story as laughable, repetitive, and lacking variety, growing boring quickly. TrueGaming mentions that the story mode falls short in terms of length, dialogue quality, and cinematic presentation compared to other fighting game franchises. Additionally, TheSixthAxis criticizes the awfully paced narrative, hammy voice acting, and lack of explanation for heroes coming together, which contributes to nonsensical interactions. Overall, the consensus among critics regarding the story of Marvel vs. Capcom: Infinite leans towards mixed to negative feedback. While some reviewers appreciated the engaging interactions between characters, unexpected twists, and fan service moments, others found the story lacking in humor, coherence, and depth. Critics like COGconnected and Digital Trends highlighted the positives, while Arcade Sushi, Cubed3, TrueGaming, and TheSixthAxis pointed out various shortcomings in the storytelling, dialogue, and overall execution of the narrative. Ultimately, the opinions vary widely, showcasing a range of perspectives on the story mode of the game.

The opinions of the critics regarding the gameplay of Marvel vs. Capcom: Infinite are varied, but there are several positive aspects that stand out. Critics such as PC Gamer, Gameplanet, and TrueGaming praise the accessibility of the gameplay, with simple combos and easy hyper combos that cater to both newcomers and experienced players. The addition of the Infinity Stones, as highlighted by Destructoid and Worth Playing, adds depth and strategic options to combat, allowing for diverse playstyles and tactical decisions. The tag team system, as noted by PlaySense and Easy Allies, enhances the gameplay experience by providing opportunities for strategic team switches and combo attacks. Overall, the gameplay is commended for being entertaining, fast-paced, and flexible, with innovative mechanics like the Infinity Stones and tag system contributing to the depth of the combat experience. On the flip side, some critics express concerns and criticisms regarding the gameplay of Marvel vs. Capcom: Infinite. Let's Play Video Games and TheXboxHub point out issues with balance and unbalanced mechanics, with the Infinity Stones potentially diminishing the importance of complex inputs and leading to awkward blocking mechanics. TheXboxHub also mentions that the heavy reliance on combos can make the combat feel more like a chore than enjoyable. Additionally, Cubed3 and Gaming Nexus highlight the lack of depth and variety in modes, suggesting that the gameplay experience may feel somewhat limited or repetitive for some players. These criticisms indicate that while the game has its strengths, there are areas where improvements could be made to enhance the overall gameplay experience. Overall, the consensus among the critics is that Marvel vs. Capcom: Infinite offers a mix of positive and negative aspects in its gameplay. While the game is praised for its accessibility, entertaining combat mechanics, and the introduction of new features like the Infinity Stones and tag system, there are concerns raised about balance issues, lack of depth in modes, and certain gameplay mechanics feeling unpolished. Critics like IGN and USgamer appreciate the depth and strategic possibilities offered by the Infinity Stones, while others like TheXboxHub and Cubed3 point out flaws in execution that detract from the overall enjoyment of the gameplay. Ultimately, the game seems to cater well to a broad audience, with its mix of easy and complex controls, strategic depth, and flashy combat mechanics, but there are areas where further refinement could elevate the gameplay experience for all players.

The opinions of several critics regarding the Graphics and Visual Design of Marvel vs. Capcom: Infinite are varied. Some critics, such as COGconnected and Digital Trends, appreciate the enhanced visual style of characters brought in from Ultimate Marvel vs Capcom 3 and the bright, colorful comic book aesthetic that offers great fan service and gameplay variety. Additionally, Game Over Online commends the detailed characters and outstanding environments in the game, while Generación Xbox is impressed with the fluid animations, stunning visuals, and detailed fighters. On the other hand, many critics express negative opinions about the graphics and visual design of Marvel vs. Capcom: Infinite. Critics like Critical Hit and Destructoid criticize the character design, with Marvel characters being described as looking like rubber sacks and Capcom characters lacking charm. Shacknews and Slant Magazine highlight the ugly and blocky character designs, with distracting vacant stares and hideous appearances. Furthermore, Cheat Code Central and PC PowerPlay critique the sterile and uninspired presentation, with character models looking terrible and lacking expression. Overall, the consensus among critics leans towards a more negative view of the Graphics and Visual Design of Marvel vs. Capcom: Infinite. While some critics appreciate certain aspects like the colorful comic book aesthetic and detailed environments, the majority highlight issues such as inconsistent character designs, lackluster visuals, and a generic art style. Critics like Gameplanet and GameStar feel that the game falls short in comparison to other titles in the genre, lacking the unique comic book feel of its predecessors and failing to impress with character models and UI design. The general sentiment is that Marvel vs. Capcom: Infinite's graphics and visual design do not meet the expectations set by previous entries in the series, resulting in a mixed reception among reviewers.

In terms of positives, several critics highlighted certain aspects of the Sound Design and Music in Marvel vs. Capcom: Infinite. Hardcore Gamer praised the soundtrack for its Marvel-esque flair and unique character theme music, while Game Over Online commended the diverse and epic soundtrack that enhanced the high-stakes feel of battles. Additionally, CGMagazine appreciated the mix of serious and campy moments in the voice acting, with some characters like Iron Man and Chris Redfield standing out positively. On the flip side, there were notable criticisms regarding the Sound Design and Music of the game. IGN mentioned that the music was forgettable and lacked character compared to previous entries in the series, while Push Square and Game Rant criticized the voice acting as poor and atrocious, respectively. Twinfinite and Video Chums also pointed out issues with flat voice acting, awkward cutscenes, and music that felt out of place in a fighting game. Overall, the consensus among critics leans towards a mixed reception of the Sound Design and Music in Marvel vs. Capcom: Infinite. While there were positive remarks regarding specific elements like character theme music and diverse soundtracks, the general sentiment seemed to highlight shortcomings such as forgettable music, poor voice acting, and a lack of impact in the sound design. Critics like Let's Play Video Games and USgamer appreciated certain aspects of the voice work and interactions between characters, contributing positively to the overall experience. However, the overall consensus suggests that the Sound Design and Music did not reach the heights of previous entries in the series, leaving room for improvement in future iterations.

The voice acting in Marvel vs. Capcom: Infinite received a mix of positive and negative feedback from critics. Some reviewers, like IGN Spain and Game Over Online, appreciated the voice work, noting that it was well done and benefited from having a real story to work with. CGMagazine also highlighted that characters like Iron Man and Chris Redfield were well-acted, adding to the overall experience. Let's Play Video Games praised the fully voice-acted story mode for enhancing the game's cinematic feel and providing special interactions between characters. On the other hand, several critics expressed negative opinions about the voice acting in the game. Push Square and TheSixthAxis criticized the voice acting for being atrocious, hammy, and not adding depth to the characters or story. Twinfinite mentioned that the flat voice acting in the story mode made interactions between characters feel forced and awkward. Game Rant and Video Chums also found the voice acting lacking emotion and enthusiasm, with some dialogues being poorly delivered or out of place. Overall, the consensus among the critics leans towards a mixed reception of the voice acting in Marvel vs. Capcom: Infinite. While some reviewers appreciated specific performances and the overall cinematic experience created by the voice work, others found it lacking in depth, emotion, and consistency. USgamer's positive feedback on the voicework and writing enhancing the pulpy comic-like story, along with Gamers' Temple's acknowledgment of some characters resembling their Hollywood movie counterparts, adds to the complexity of opinions. The varied responses indicate that the quality of the voice acting in the game may be subjective and dependent on individual preferences for character portrayals and storytelling in a crossover title like this.

In terms of technical performance on the PS4, the majority of critics praised Marvel vs. Capcom: Infinite for its stable online gameplay and reliable netcode. App Trigger highlighted the almost local-like experience in online matches with strong connections, while Easy Allies noted the noticeable improvement in network stability compared to its predecessor. Critics like Everyeye.it and PlayStation LifeStyle commended the minimal lag issues and smooth action online. Additionally, PlaySense appreciated the smooth online gameplay and technically sound offline features tailored for beginners. However, on the PS4, there were some negative aspects highlighted by critics. Cubed3 and Gameplanet pointed out long loading times as a significant issue affecting the overall experience. IGN Spain identified a notable bug affecting local multiplayer, which could hinder the enjoyment for some players. The SixthAxis mentioned the lack of vital information for Ranked battles and some Infinity Stone issues at launch, indicating potential areas for improvement. Moving on to the Xbox One platform, CGMagazine and GameSpew noted technical issues such as long load times and image quality criticisms. Game Over Online highlighted the terrible load times as a major drawback, impacting the pacing of the game. Gamers' Temple also mentioned the frustration caused by long loading times in a genre where quick matches are expected. Overall, the consensus among critics for Marvel vs. Capcom: Infinite's technical performance across all platforms leans towards positive feedback on the netcode and online stability. GameSpot praised the reliable netcode and smooth gameplay under good connections, while Shacknews and MondoXbox highlighted minimal lag experiences. However, there were concerns raised by Let's Play Video Games and The Overpowered Noobs regarding technical issues like lag, stuttering, and bugs on the PC platform. USgamer also pointed out noticeable flaws in loading transitions and post-match menus, detracting from the overall experience. Despite some platform-specific issues, the game generally received praise for its online performance and netcode implementation, with room for improvement in load times and technical optimizations on certain platforms.

The opinions of the critics regarding the replay value of Marvel vs. Capcom: Infinite are varied, with several positive aspects highlighted. App Trigger mentions the various modes available, including practice and mission modes, local versus mode, and online matches, providing a range of options for players to engage with. Arcade Sushi appreciates the strategic depth added by the Infinity Stones and the balanced roster of characters. COGconnected and Digitally Downloaded both emphasize the variety of characters and strategic depth, with potential for future DLC to enhance replayability. TrueGaming praises the diverse character roster, training missions, and online play options, catering to different player preferences and offering a wealth of content for replay value. On the other hand, some critics point out negative aspects that may impact the game's replayability. Cubed3 and Gaming Nexus express concerns about the lack of modes and depth beyond the arcade mode, potentially limiting long-term engagement for players. Let's Play Video Games criticizes the limited character roster, DLC practices, and combat basics, which contribute to a lack of replay value and disappointment among players. Slant Magazine and The Jimquisition highlight issues such as the absence of individual character endings and design choices impacting long-term replayability. Overall, the consensus among critics leans towards Marvel vs. Capcom: Infinite offering a decent amount of replay value through its diverse character roster, strategic gameplay mechanics, and online multiplayer options. Critics like GameSpot and PlayStation LifeStyle appreciate the comprehensive training modes, varied gameplay modes, and diverse roster, catering to both casual and hardcore players. However, criticisms from critics like Let's Play Video Games and Slant Magazine regarding the limited content and design choices suggest that the game may not have universal appeal in terms of replayability. Despite some shortcomings, the game seems to strike a balance between offering engaging gameplay for different player preferences while also leaving room for improvement in terms of content depth and innovation.