Battlefield 1

The story of Battlefield 1 has received praise from several critics for its emotionally impactful and unique approach to portraying the horrors of World War I. Critics such as GameSpot and Trusted Reviews commend the game for its well-crafted narrative vignettes in the War Stories mode, which offer a more focused experience with diverse perspectives and emotional character arcs. The episodic nature of the war stories, as highlighted by Twinfinite, provides players with a glimpse into the lives of different soldiers, showcasing unity, friendship, and respect among them. The game's ability to capture the essence of trench warfare and offer a somber tone without glorifying war, as noted by Impulsegamer and Game Informer, adds depth to the storytelling and creates a powerful narrative experience. However, despite the positive aspects of the story in Battlefield 1, there are criticisms from critics such as Washington Post and Worth Playing regarding the lack of historical depth and impactful portrayal of war in the missions. The rushed writing, lack of character development, and abrupt endings of missions, as mentioned by IGN Italia, hinder the overall storytelling experience. Some critics, like Gameplanet and Metro GameCentral, point out that the campaign lacks depth and character development, with stories feeling slight and not fully exploring the reasons for the war or providing a comprehensive view of the conflict. Additionally, the varying quality of segments within the campaign, as highlighted by Hooked Gamers, leads to a somewhat inconsistent delivery and impact on players. Overall, the consensus among critics is that Battlefield 1's story succeeds in capturing the human stories and emotional weight of World War I through its War Stories mode. The game effectively portrays the horrors and heroism of the conflict, offering players a unique perspective on the wartime experiences of different characters. While some critics appreciate the game's respectful and engrossing storytelling, others feel that it falls short in delivering a fully immersive and historically rich narrative. Despite the mixed reviews on the depth and character development within the campaign, Battlefield 1 ultimately offers a compelling and poignant portrayal of the Great War, resonating with players through its emotional storytelling and diverse perspectives.

The majority of critics praised the gameplay of Battlefield 1, highlighting various positive aspects. Games(TM) mentioned that the gameplay can be engaging and exhilarating, with moments of intensity. Yahoo! appreciated the well-balanced classes and massive maps filled with structures, along with the depth added by vehicles. GameSpot and TrueGaming both commended the teamwork and coordination emphasized in the gameplay, with a focus on player roles and unique challenges in new game modes like Operations. IGN Italia and Eurogamer Italy lauded the ability to drive tanks, pilot planes, and engage in stealthy assaults, as well as the rich and immersive experience with attention to detail in campaign missions. On the negative side, some critics pointed out issues with the gameplay of Battlefield 1. Polygon mentioned common Battlefield issues like brain-dead enemy AI, while Gaming Age found the final mission to be a bit of a slog. Metro GameCentral expressed disappointment in map size and destruction effects, and ZTGD highlighted issues with snipers and the revamped class system. These criticisms indicate that while the majority of reviewers found the gameplay to be very good, there were still some areas that could be improved upon. Overall, the consensus among critics is overwhelmingly positive regarding the gameplay of Battlefield 1. Critics like Gameplanet and Post Arcade praised the strategic and engaging nature of the gameplay, reflecting the intensity and brutality of the First World War setting. Shacknews and Twinfinite appreciated the diverse modes and well-crafted level design, providing players with a satisfying and immersive experience. The blend of classic Battlefield elements with new mechanics, as noted by The Games Machine, ensures that the gameplay stays true to the series' traditions while introducing fresh gameplay opportunities. Despite some minor criticisms, the general sentiment is that Battlefield 1 delivers a compelling and enjoyable gameplay experience that resonated well with the majority of critics.

The majority of critics unanimously praised the graphics and visual design of Battlefield 1, with many highlighting the stunning and immersive visuals that the game offers. Critics like GameSpew and GRYOnline.pl commended the game for its expansive and detailed visuals, character-filled environments, impressive lighting, and draw distance, creating a visually appealing experience. The Digital Fix and Destructoid appreciated the unique visual style and diverse maps that Battlefield 1 presented, with stylized elements that didn't go overboard with the trench warfare theme. IGN Sweden and Trusted Reviews also noted exceptional visuals that showcased the power of the Frostbite engine, setting new standards for graphical quality. While the overall sentiment towards the graphics and visual design of Battlefield 1 was overwhelmingly positive, some critics did point out a few shortcomings. AusGamers mentioned collision mechanics flaws, while GamesRadar+ and Areajugones noted issues like bugs, crashes, long loading times, and occasional frame drops. XGN highlighted minor flaws in the single-player campaign visuals, and PlayStation LifeStyle mentioned occasional performance issues in intense multiplayer battles. Despite these criticisms, the general consensus was that the positives of the game's graphics far outweighed the negatives. Overall, Battlefield 1 received high praise for its graphics and visual design, with critics lauding its stunning realism, attention to detail, destructible environments, and immersive atmosphere that effectively captured the essence of World War I battles. The game's visuals were described as breathtaking, gorgeous, and visually stunning by various reviewers, showcasing the power of the Frostbite engine and pushing the boundaries of graphical fidelity in gaming. The consensus among critics was that Battlefield 1's graphics and visual design played a significant role in enhancing the overall gaming experience, contributing to the game's success and setting a new standard for graphical excellence in the first-person shooter genre.

The majority of critics unanimously praised the sound design and music of Battlefield 1, highlighting its exceptional quality and immersive nature. Critics such as DarkStation, Digital Chumps, and Gameplanet all commended the detailed sound effects that added authenticity to the game, with elements like clattering bullet shells, thunderous booms, and distinct weapon sounds standing out. The atmospheric music and sounds were noted to enhance the gameplay experience, creating a realistic battlefield atmosphere that resonated strongly with players. Gaming Age specifically mentioned the exceptional sound design, including an echo effect when firing guns indoors and a memorable soundtrack, contributing to the overall immersive experience. While the overall sentiment towards the sound design and music of Battlefield 1 was overwhelmingly positive, there were a few minor criticisms mentioned by some critics. PlaySense noted occasional sound issues in single-player mode, which could potentially detract from the overall experience for some players. IGN Italia criticized the Italian voice acting for lacking emotion and engagement, impacting the storytelling aspect of the game. These criticisms, however, were in the minority compared to the widespread acclaim for the game's audio elements. In conclusion, Battlefield 1 received high praise for its sound design and music from a majority of critics, with many highlighting it as a standout feature of the game. The detailed and authentic sound effects, immersive atmosphere, and memorable soundtrack were consistently lauded as enhancing the overall experience of the game. Critics like GameSpot, Game Revolution, and TrueAchievements all emphasized the stunning and moving nature of the music and sound design, contributing to the game's success in capturing the grim atmosphere of World War 1. Despite a few minor critiques, the consensus among reviewers is that Battlefield 1 excelled in delivering a top-notch audio experience that truly immersed players in the chaotic and intense world of war.

The Voice Acting in Battlefield 1 has received overwhelmingly positive feedback from the majority of critics. Gaming Age commends the voice acting as "top-notch," emphasizing how it stands out amidst the chaos of explosions, showcasing the quality of the performances. Post Arcade from National Post echoes this sentiment, noting that the strong voice acting enhances the storytelling by making the characters more relatable and engaging players in their survival. GamingTrend further praises the exceptional voice acting for its contribution to storytelling and character development, highlighting how it elevates the overall narrative experience. Digitally Downloaded and Game Revolution also laud the voice acting as excellent, with the former emphasizing how it immerses players in the war stories through compelling character portrayals and immersive storytelling. Trusted Reviews adds to the positive sentiment by describing the voice acting as brilliant, emphasizing how it brings the characters to life and enhances the believability of the narratives being presented. Despite the overwhelmingly positive reception, there are some criticisms regarding the Voice Acting in Battlefield 1. IGN Italia specifically points out issues with the Italian voice acting, criticizing it for being approximate and lacking emotion. This critique stands out amidst the predominantly positive feedback from other critics, indicating that there may be inconsistencies in the quality of voice acting across different language options in the game. While this negative feedback is noteworthy, it is important to consider that it is an isolated criticism compared to the overall positive reception of the voice acting in the game. Overall, the consensus among the critics is that the Voice Acting in Battlefield 1 is exceptional, with the majority praising it for its top-notch quality, contribution to storytelling, and character development. The positive feedback from Gaming Age, Post Arcade, GamingTrend, Digitally Downloaded, Game Revolution, and Trusted Reviews highlights the effectiveness of the voice acting in immersing players in the game's narratives and bringing the characters to life. While there are some criticisms, such as IGN Italia's mention of issues with the Italian voice acting, these critiques do not detract significantly from the overall positive reception of the voice acting in Battlefield 1. The general sentiment is that the voice acting greatly enhances the gaming experience, making it a standout aspect of the game for many critics.

In terms of technical performance on the PS4, the majority of critics praised Battlefield 1 for its stable servers and minimal technical issues during multiplayer gameplay. Reviewers like PlaySense and XGN highlighted the game's solid performance with minimal lag, while Post Arcade and Gameplanet noted a smooth experience without crashes or disconnects. Despite some occasional frame rate drops and bugs in single-player mode, the overall sentiment for the PS4 version leans towards positive feedback, with only a few critics mentioning performance issues during intense multiplayer battles, as noted by PlayStation LifeStyle. On the flip side, some critics pointed out specific drawbacks of Battlefield 1 on the PS4. Game Informer and GameSpot both mentioned quality-of-life issues such as crashes and server lag, impacting the overall experience for players. PlayStation Universe highlighted downtime with servers affecting online play, while Twinfinite noted bugs and crashes in both multiplayer and campaign modes, albeit without significant impact on the game's enjoyment. These criticisms indicate that while the PS4 version of Battlefield 1 generally performed well, there were still notable technical issues that some players encountered during their gameplay sessions. Overall, the consensus among critics for Battlefield 1's technical performance across all gaming platforms is mostly positive, with a few exceptions. The game was commended for stable servers, solid performance, and minimal technical issues by reviewers like Hobby Consolas, Multiplayer.it, and PC Gamer. However, some critics like Shacknews and ICXM highlighted significant bugs and performance fluctuations in certain scenarios, calling for updates to address these issues. Despite these varying opinions, the general consensus leans towards Battlefield 1 delivering a technically sound experience with immersive gameplay across different platforms, with each version having its own strengths and weaknesses as noted by various critics throughout their reviews.

The opinions of several critics highlight the positive aspects of the replay value in Battlefield 1. GameSpot commends the game for its diverse multiplayer modes, smart map designs, and robust progression system, which provide ample opportunities for replayability. The War Stories anthology and Operations mode are specifically mentioned for offering varied experiences and educational content, enhancing the overall replay value. Additionally, Game Rant praises the multiplayer mode for its various modes and large-scale battles, while Digitally Downloaded appreciates the around a dozen hours of gameplay provided by the single-player campaign, which is considered better than many other shooters. The inclusion of new modes like Operations and War Pigeons, as noted by XGN, also adds variety to the multiplayer experience, catering to different playstyles and keeping players engaged. On the flip side, some critics raise concerns about factors that may hinder the replay value of Battlefield 1. Game Over Online points out that issues with game balance in multiplayer could affect the overall replayability, while Impulsegamer mentions that some maps lack compelling points of interest, potentially impacting the gameplay experience. Furthermore, The Escapist, while looking forward to replaying the single-player campaign, does not specifically mention the replay value in multiplayer, suggesting a potential disparity in the overall appeal of different game modes. Additionally, AusGamers expresses mixed feelings about changes in teamwork dynamics in Conquest mode, indicating that certain gameplay elements may not resonate with all players, affecting long-term replayability. Overall, the consensus among critics leans towards Battlefield 1 offering significant replay value, particularly in its multiplayer modes. Positive feedback regarding the diverse gameplay experiences, engaging combat, and variety of maps and modes contributes to the game's overall replayability. Critics like GameSpot and GameSpew highlight the addictiveness and incentive to replay provided by the multiplayer modes, while TrueAchievements expresses a desire for more content after completing the relatively short campaign. Despite some concerns raised by critics regarding balance issues, map design, and potential lack of innovation in certain aspects, the general sentiment suggests that Battlefield 1 succeeds in providing an enjoyable and replayable experience for players across different platforms.