Battlefield Hardline

The opinions of the critics regarding the story of Battlefield Hardline are varied. Some critics, such as Gaming Nexus and NZGamer, found the story to be enjoyable and engaging. They praised the twists and turns in the narrative, as well as the likable characters and highly-entertaining set pieces. IGN Italia also commended the well-written dialogues and good voice acting, comparing the story to the TV series True Detective. These positive aspects of the story indicate that there were elements that resonated with certain critics and provided an enjoyable experience. On the other hand, several critics expressed negative opinions about the story of Battlefield Hardline. Destructoid criticized the story for being shallow and unoriginal, lacking engagement with contemporary issues. PC Games and Critical Hit found the story to be cliched and predictable, with easily foreseeable twists. Giant Bomb and Game Informer both mentioned the lack of character development, tension, and logic in the story. These criticisms highlight the weaknesses in the storytelling and the lack of originality in the plot. Overall, the consensus among the critics is mixed. While some critics found enjoyment in the story and praised certain aspects such as twists, characters, and presentation, others criticized it for being cliched, predictable, and lacking depth. The story of Battlefield Hardline seems to have missed the opportunity to provide meaningful social commentary on police violence, as mentioned by New York Daily News and USgamer. The overall sentiment leans towards disappointment, with the story failing to meet the expectations of a popular cop drama, as stated by Game Revolution and Push Square. The lack of nuance, monotonous storytelling, and repetitive nature of the campaign were also mentioned as negative aspects by games(TM).

The opinions of the critics regarding the gameplay of Battlefield Hardline are varied, but there are several positive aspects that stand out. Many critics praise the inclusion of stealth mechanics and non-lethal takedowns, which add depth and variety to the gameplay experience. The ability to arrest criminals instead of simply killing them is seen as a refreshing change and a unique feature of the game. The gameplay is also commended for offering multiple routes and encouraging players to take their time and explore the environments. The shooting mechanics are described as tight and polished, and the inclusion of realistic weapons and gadgets is appreciated by some critics. The multiplayer gameplay is generally well-received, with smooth gameplay and quick lobby joining being highlighted as positives by Critical Hit. The multiplayer is seen as the highlight of the game by games(TM), offering a breathless tactical shooter experience that combines elements of both Call of Duty and Battlefield. However, there are also some negative aspects that critics point out regarding the gameplay of Battlefield Hardline. One common criticism is the lack of challenge in the combat, with some critics mentioning that the AI is not very challenging. The action is described as lacking by PC Games, and the occasional slower pace may not appeal to adrenaline junkies, according to CGMagazine. Some critics, such as Giant Bomb, mention that the AI-controlled partner can sometimes break the stealth and make the gameplay feel less immersive. Glitches in the campaign, such as enemies clipping through walls, are also mentioned by Softpedia as a drawback. The design decision to give loud shotguns and explosives instead of stealth weapons in the campaign is seen as odd by DarkZero. Overall, the consensus among the critics is that the gameplay of Battlefield Hardline introduces some fresh and interesting mechanics, such as stealth and non-lethal takedowns, which contribute to a slower and more deliberate campaign. The multiplayer gameplay is generally praised for its fast-paced and condensed nature, with smaller maps and a focus on infantry combat. The inclusion of multiple game modes and the ability to arrest criminals are seen as positives that add variety to the gameplay experience. However, there are some drawbacks, such as the lack of challenge in combat and occasional glitches. Despite these criticisms, the overall sentiment is that the gameplay of Battlefield Hardline offers a unique and enjoyable experience, particularly in its multiplayer mode, and is an improvement compared to previous games in the series.

The opinions of the critics regarding the Graphics and Visual Design of Battlefield Hardline are generally positive. PC Games, Softpedia, CGMagazine, New York Daily News, ZTGD, DarkZero, GameTrailers, Metro GameCentral, NZGamer, Slant Magazine, USgamer, and games(TM) all praise the game's visuals to varying degrees. PC Games and Softpedia both mention the impressive graphics, with Softpedia specifically noting that the game has gorgeous visuals even at lower settings. CGMagazine highlights the slick visuals and impressive presentation, while New York Daily News compliments the terrific cutscenes and strong overall presentation. ZTGD praises the game's great visuals on consoles, particularly the impressive facial animations and solid frame rate. DarkZero also mentions the top-notch voice acting, performances, facial animations, and dialogue. GameTrailers appreciates the toned-down destruction and the more grounded nature of the game. Metro GameCentral compliments the excellent design of the multiplayer maps. NZGamer specifically mentions the impressive graphics in Hardline, competing well with other triple A, campaign-driven shooters. USgamer describes the game as looking outstanding with incredible attention to detail. games(TM) praises the exceptional map design and consistently ingenious visual design. However, there are some negative aspects mentioned by the critics. Softpedia points out loading glitches with pieces of the environment not rendering. DarkZero mentions that the characters' dialogue when scanning items is uninteresting. GamesRadar+ states that the weapons and vehicles in Hardline are less interesting than normal Battlefield games. Push Square notes that while the characters look fantastic, the online maps can look minimalistic. Overall, the consensus among the critics is that Battlefield Hardline has impressive graphics and visual design. The game is praised for its slick visuals, impressive presentation, top-notch facial animations, and attention to detail. The multiplayer maps are also commended for their excellent design. However, there are some minor issues mentioned, such as loading glitches, uninteresting dialogue, and less interesting weapons and vehicles compared to previous Battlefield games. Despite these criticisms, the overall sentiment is positive, with the majority of critics praising the game's graphics and visual design.

The opinions of the critics regarding the Sound Design and Music of Battlefield Hardline are generally positive. Softpedia praises the soundtrack, mentioning top-notch orchestral scores and licensed tracks. They also appreciate the good voice acting, although they note that some responses from criminals are recycled. NZGamer agrees, stating that the sound design in Hardline is well done, with good sound effects and music. They both highlight the positive aspects of the game's audio. However, there are a few criticisms regarding the Sound Design and Music of Battlefield Hardline. CGMagazine mentions that while the game has a rap/hip-hop heavy soundtrack that keeps a home theater subwoofer busy, the ambient surround sound is not as rich as in other games. GamesRadar+ also notes that shootouts feel quieter than in previous Battlefield games, which may affect the overall immersive experience for some players. Overall, the consensus among the critics is that the Sound Design and Music of Battlefield Hardline are well-executed. The voice acting receives praise from multiple critics, with New York Daily News describing it as standout and Slant Magazine stating that it is uniformly strong. IGN Italia also commends the Italian localization and extensive cast of voice actors, although it is mentioned that it doesn't reach the level of other notable performances. Additionally, Push Square mentions that the audio is mixed well enough, with epic battles sounding as they should and vehicles screeching around corners. The Telegraph and USgamer both highly praise the sound design of Battlefield Hardline, with the latter specifically highlighting its terrific quality in multiplayer mode. Overall, the positive feedback from the majority of critics suggests that the Sound Design and Music of Battlefield Hardline contribute positively to the overall gaming experience.

The opinions of the critics regarding the voice acting in Battlefield Hardline are quite varied. Some critics, such as CGMagazine and New York Daily News, praise the voice acting, with CGMagazine specifically highlighting the performances of actors like Kelly Hu and Nicholas Gonzalez. Digital Trends also mentions that the voice performances are good or better throughout the game. These positive opinions indicate that the voice acting in Battlefield Hardline is generally well-received and effective in delivering the lines. However, there are also some negative opinions regarding the voice acting. Destructoid criticizes the voice work for not saying anything meaningful, while X-ONE Magazine UK mentions that the dialogue is cheesy and poorly written. Additionally, X-ONE Magazine UK criticizes the cast of D-list actors for not bringing an impressive Hollywood shine to the production. These negative opinions suggest that there are shortcomings in the quality of the voice acting, particularly in terms of the writing and the choice of actors. Overall, the consensus among the critics is somewhat mixed. While there are positive opinions from critics like CGMagazine, New York Daily News, and Digital Trends, there are also negative opinions from critics like Destructoid and X-ONE Magazine UK. However, it is worth noting that some critics, such as Critical Hit and DarkZero, praise the voice acting as top-notch and some, like IGN Italia, specifically mention the praise for the Italian version of the game. This indicates that there are differing views on the quality of the voice acting in Battlefield Hardline, but there is a general acknowledgement that it has its strengths and weaknesses.

In terms of the Technical Performance, the critics had mixed opinions for each gaming platform. On the positive side, the Xbox One version of Battlefield Hardline received praise from multiple critics. CGMagazine mentioned that the game maintained a smooth 60 frames per second, with stable overall performance. Critical Hit highlighted the smooth multiplayer experience with constant connections and quick lobby joining, without any game-breaking issues. Giant Bomb also commended the functionality of the game, stating that it was an improvement over the stability issues of its predecessor, Battlefield 4. Game Informer and NZGamer mentioned the smooth launch of the game on the PlayStation 4, with rock solid servers and reliable matchmaking. However, there were some negative aspects to the Technical Performance on certain platforms. Softpedia noted glitches in the PC version, such as enemies and allies clipping through walls or objects, as well as lengthy loading times. DarkZero criticized the AI in the PlayStation 4 version, describing both ally and enemy AI as brain dead and pointing out issues with teammate AI blocking paths and ruining stealth sections. Push Square mentioned that dying on spawn was incredibly common in the PlayStation 4 version. Overall, the consensus among the critics is that the Technical Performance of Battlefield Hardline was generally satisfactory. The Xbox One version received positive feedback for its smooth multiplayer experience and stability, with critics like Critical Hit and Digital Trends highlighting its functionality. The PlayStation 4 version also had a smooth launch with minimal lag, according to Game Informer and GameTrailers. However, there were some negative aspects mentioned, such as glitches and inconsistencies in the game, as well as issues with AI and dying on spawn. Despite these drawbacks, the overall sentiment suggests that Battlefield Hardline had a relatively stable Technical Performance across different gaming platforms.

The opinions of the critics regarding the replay value of Battlefield Hardline are mixed. Several critics highlight the positive aspects of the game's replay value, particularly in the multiplayer modes. Critics such as Gaming Nexus and Arcade Sushi praise the multiplayer component for offering new modes and progression systems, providing replay value. They mention the variety of game modes and the redesigned progression system, which offer a refreshing experience for Battlefield fans. EGM also mentions that the new modes in multiplayer, especially the eSports-focused modes, provide replay value and may attract newcomers to the series. Additionally, Telegraph highlights the multiplayer mode as the best feature of Battlefield Hardline, with new modes like Blood Money and infantry-based modes being praised for their fresh and intense gameplay. On the other hand, some critics express negative opinions about the replay value of Battlefield Hardline. PC Games states that the single-player campaign alone is not worth buying the game for, suggesting that it lacks replay value. IGN Italia also criticizes the single-player campaign, describing it as linear and limiting its replay value. They mention that the game offers around ten hours of gameplay, but the replay value is considered to be lower. Cheat Code Central mentions that while the innovative modes are great, the classic modes are boring, and the top-down hacker mode gets boring after a few minutes. Overall, the consensus among the critics is that Battlefield Hardline offers some replay value, particularly in its multiplayer modes. The variety of game modes and progression systems are praised for providing a refreshing experience and attracting newcomers to the series. However, the single-player campaign is generally considered to have limited replay value, with some critics suggesting that it is not worth buying the game for. The multiplayer modes receive mixed reviews, with some modes being praised for their fresh and intense gameplay, while others are criticized for being unbalanced or lacking excitement. Despite the mixed opinions, the overall sentiment is that Battlefield Hardline offers enough replay value to make it a worthwhile entry in the franchise, particularly for fans of the multiplayer component.