Call of Duty: WWII

The opinions of the critics regarding the story of Call of Duty: WWII are quite diverse. Some critics, such as NZGamer and IBTimes UK, appreciate the game's focus on difficult decisions, power structures, and the portrayal of the indomitable human spirit. They find moments of vulnerability and spectacle, with an impactful ending. The campaign is described as emotionally gripping and having powerful moments of authentic war experiences, as mentioned by Worth Playing. These positive aspects highlight the game's attempt to capture the horror and urgency of World War II, as well as its efforts to flesh out the characters and their backstories, as noted by Easy Allies. However, there are several negative opinions regarding the story of Call of Duty: WWII. Critics like Metro GameCentral, DarkStation, and Slant Magazine criticize the campaign for its clichéd characters, lack of emotional impact, generic storytelling, and limited scope and emotion. They mention the lack of character development and emotional investment, as well as the story's platitude-heavy nature and lack of authenticity and grit. The storytelling is described as flat, lightweight, and lacking a clear narrative structure, as mentioned by PlayStation Country and GamesRadar+. The campaign is also criticized for being repetitive and reminiscent of previous Call of Duty games, according to the Washington Post. Overall, the consensus among the critics is that while Call of Duty: WWII's campaign has some positive aspects, such as its attempts to capture the horrors of war and its well-paced storytelling, it falls short in terms of originality, emotional impact, and character development. The campaign is often described as clichéd, lacking depth, and failing to provide a compelling tale. Critics like DualShockers and Game Informer mention that the emotional moments didn't resonate, and the narrative didn't raise the bar for a Call of Duty game. Despite the mixed opinions, it is clear that the story of Call of Duty: WWII has its strengths and weaknesses, leaving room for improvement in future iterations.

The opinions of the critics regarding the gameplay of Call of Duty: WWII are generally positive. Many critics highlight the solid gunplay and enjoyable multiplayer experience. NZGamer mentions that the campaign introduces vehicle sections and changes in tone, while Meristation notes the inclusion of first-person action, weapons, ammunition, and killstreaks. The Sydney Morning Herald praises the fast and frenetic shooting action in the three gameplay modes: story mode, competitive multiplayer, and co-operative 'Zombies' mode. GamesRadar+ also commends the solid and fun gameplay, with great set pieces and moments. These positive opinions indicate that the gameplay in Call of Duty: WWII offers engaging and enjoyable experiences for players. However, there are some negative aspects mentioned by critics as well. Slant Magazine criticizes the lack of meaningful choices and observable consequences in the gameplay, while Cheat Code Central mentions that the stealth system feels underdeveloped. Destructoid criticizes the multiplayer maps for being flat and uninspired, with too many choke points and blind corners. These criticisms suggest that there are certain areas in the gameplay that could have been improved or expanded upon to enhance the overall experience. Overall, the consensus among the critics is that the gameplay in Call of Duty: WWII is solid and enjoyable, with some minor flaws. Critics like Metro GameCentral and DualShockers appreciate the fun and precise gunplay, while The Sydney Morning Herald and Gaming Age highlight the rewarding multiplayer modes and intricate maps. However, some critics, such as Slant Magazine and Destructoid, express concerns about certain aspects of the gameplay, such as the lack of meaningful choices and uninspired multiplayer maps. Despite these criticisms, the majority of critics agree that Call of Duty: WWII offers a satisfying gameplay experience that captures the essence of the series while introducing some new elements.

The majority of the critics praised the graphics and visual design of Call of Duty: WWII, with many describing them as stunning, excellent, and visually impressive. NZGamer, Metro GameCentral, TheSixthAxis, DarkStation, The Sydney Morning Herald, PlayStation Country, Game Rant, Washington Post, ZTGD, Xbox Achievements, Destructoid, IGN Spain, IGN Italia, Post Arcade, COGconnected, and CGMagazine all expressed positive opinions about the game's visuals. They highlighted various aspects such as beautifully rendered levels, high production values, feature-film quality visuals, fantastic character models, stunning environments, and impressive lighting and details. The snowy Ardennes forest level was specifically praised by the Washington Post for its visual design and representation of the series' evolution. While the overall sentiment towards the graphics and visual design of Call of Duty: WWII was positive, there were a few criticisms mentioned by some critics. GamesRadar+ noted that while the graphics and visual design were well done, there was nothing particularly groundbreaking or innovative. FANDOM mentioned that although the game had impressive cutscenes with facial technology, the faces of the characters looked too similar, relying on props to differentiate soldiers. IGN Italia also mentioned a lack of variety and choice in the game's visuals. Overall, the consensus among the critics is that the graphics and visual design of Call of Duty: WWII are very good. The majority of the critics praised the game's stunning visuals, impressive details, and authentic World War II experience. The positive opinions from multiple critics, including NZGamer, Metro GameCentral, The Sydney Morning Herald, PlayStation Country, and Xbox Achievements, support the overall sentiment that the graphics and visual design of Call of Duty: WWII are a strong aspect of the game. While there were a few minor criticisms, they did not significantly impact the overall positive reception of the game's visuals.

The opinions of the critics regarding the Sound Design and Music of Call of Duty: WWII are generally positive. Multiple critics, such as PlayStation Country and Xbox Achievements, praise the sound and music for effectively portraying epic firefights, tension, and adding to the overall cinematic experience. The voice acting in the game is highly regarded by DarkStation, IBTimes UK, and Xbox Achievements, with notable performances from David Tennant, Elodie Yung, and Ving Rhames. This consistent praise for the voice acting indicates that it is a standout aspect of the game's sound design. In terms of negatives, ZTGD mentions that the jump scares in the Nazi Zombies mode are limited, which may be disappointing for players seeking a more intense and frightening experience. Additionally, CGMagazine notes that while the sound effects are booming and immersive, the soundtrack is fairly standard for the genre. This suggests that the music, while effective, may not be particularly innovative or memorable. Overall, the consensus among the critics is that the Sound Design and Music of Call of Duty: WWII are strong and contribute positively to the gameplay experience. The voice acting is consistently praised, with notable performances from various actors. The sound effects are immersive and help create a realistic and intense atmosphere during firefights. The music, while not groundbreaking, effectively sets the mood for different modes and adds to the cinematic feel of the game. The positive opinions of multiple critics, such as PlayStation Country and Xbox Achievements, further support the overall positive sentiment towards the Sound Design and Music of Call of Duty: WWII.

The overall sentiment towards the voice acting in Call of Duty: WWII is predominantly positive, with several critics praising the performances of the cast. TheSixthAxis and DarkStation both express their opinions that the game features great and excellent voice acting, respectively. They commend the overall quality of the performances, without specifying any particular actors or characters. This indicates a general consensus among these critics that the voice acting in the game is of a high standard. However, there are some mixed opinions regarding the protagonist's voice acting. PlayStation Country criticizes the protagonist for being a blank slate and suggests that the Texan drawl doesn't allow for much emotional range. This criticism implies that the voice acting for the main character may lack depth and fail to fully convey the intended emotions. This contrasting opinion highlights a potential weakness in the voice acting of the game. On the other hand, there are specific performances that receive praise from multiple critics. IBTimes UK and Xbox Achievements both mention notable performances from actors such as David Tennant, Elodie Yung, and Ving Rhames. CGMagazine also highlights the stellar voice acting, specifically mentioning the performances of David Tenant and Katheryn Winnick. These positive mentions of specific actors indicate that there are standout performances within the game that enhance the overall voice acting experience. In conclusion, the overall sentiment towards the voice acting in Call of Duty: WWII is largely positive, with critics praising the performances of the cast. TheSixthAxis and DarkStation both express their opinions that the voice acting is great and excellent, respectively. However, there are mixed opinions regarding the protagonist's voice acting, with PlayStation Country criticizing the lack of depth and emotional range. Despite this, there are specific performances that receive praise from multiple critics, such as David Tennant, Elodie Yung, and Ving Rhames. Overall, the voice acting in Call of Duty: WWII is generally well-received, with standout performances contributing to the positive reception.

The opinions of the critics regarding the Technical Performance of Call of Duty: WWII vary across different gaming platforms. Starting with the positives for each platform, the PlayStation Country critic played the game on PS4 and mentioned that the servers are stable one week after launch, with no noticeable lag. This indicates that the game performs well on the PS4, providing a smooth and enjoyable experience. Additionally, the Post Arcade critic played the game on Xbox One and praised the streamlined lobbies, fast loading times, and smooth gameplay without any noticeable stutters. These positive aspects contribute to a seamless gaming experience on the Xbox One. Moving on to the negatives for each platform, the Game Rant critic played the game on Xbox One and mentioned occasional server issues. This suggests that while the overall performance is smooth, there are occasional hiccups that can disrupt the multiplayer experience. The ZTGD critic also played the game on Xbox One and initially experienced serious server issues and problems with the lobby system. However, the reviewer notes that these issues have improved over time. On the other hand, the Wccftech critic played the game on PS4 and mentioned that the Headquarters mode still doesn't work as advertised. This indicates a specific technical issue that affects the overall experience on the PS4 platform. Overall, the consensus among the critics is that there have been some technical issues with the game's performance, particularly during the launch period. The CGMagazine critic played the game on Xbox One and highlighted severe server issues and problematic matchmaking. However, patches have been released to improve stability, indicating that the developers are actively addressing these issues. Despite the technical challenges, the critics generally agree that the game performs well on both the PS4 and Xbox One platforms, with stable servers, smooth gameplay, and impressive visuals on the Xbox One X. It is worth noting that the ZTGD critic mentions that this is the first time in years they had to mention online issues at launch for a Call of Duty game, suggesting that the technical performance of Call of Duty: WWII may not meet the high standards set by previous installments in the franchise.

The opinions of the critics regarding the replay value of Call of Duty: WWII are mixed. Some critics, such as PlayStation Country and Game Rant, highlight the rewarding and addictive nature of the multiplayer experience, as well as the cooperative options in the Nazi Zombies mode. They believe that these aspects provide a strong replay value for players. Xbox Achievements also supports this notion, stating that the campaign is worth playing more than once and the multiplayer modes, including the new War mode, offer ample replay value. These positive opinions suggest that the game's multiplayer and cooperative modes provide engaging and enjoyable experiences that players would want to revisit. On the other hand, there are critics who express concerns about the game's replay value. Metro GameCentral mentions that the multiplayer gameplay gets old quickly and there are too few maps for the War mode. TheSixthAxis also points out that the Nazi Zombies mode may become repetitive over time. Destructoid raises concerns about the lackluster multiplayer experience and weak map designs, which may affect the game's replayability. IGN Spain further adds that the linear nature of the campaign and lack of character progression and side missions contribute to its lack of replay value. These negative opinions suggest that certain aspects of the game, such as limited maps and repetitive gameplay, may hinder the overall replayability for some players. Overall, the critics' opinions on the replay value of Call of Duty: WWII are varied. While some critics highlight the rewarding and addictive multiplayer experience, as well as the cooperative options in the Nazi Zombies mode, others express concerns about the lack of content, repetitive gameplay, and weak map designs. It is clear that the multiplayer and cooperative modes offer the most replay value, with customization options, progression systems, and new modes like War being praised by several critics. However, the limited number of maps and repetitive nature of certain modes are mentioned as potential drawbacks. Despite the mixed opinions, it can be concluded that Call of Duty: WWII offers a decent amount of replay value, particularly in its multiplayer and cooperative modes, but there are certain aspects that may limit its long-term appeal for some players.