ARMS

In analyzing the opinions of the critics regarding the story of ARMS, it is evident that there are some positive aspects highlighted. Critics like EGM and Cheat Code Central appreciate the unique and bizarre premise of the game, where individuals wake up with extendable arms and engage in a punching competition. This quirky setup adds charm and personality to the experience, with characters having visual appeal and distinctiveness, as noted by Easy Allies and Multiplayer.it. The charismatic roster of characters is seen as a positive aspect that enhances the overall enjoyment of the game, even though the story may be lacking. On the negative side, the lack of a substantial story mode is a common critique among the critics. Game Informer and GameCrate express disappointment in the absence of a proper story mode, considering it a missed opportunity for a more meaningful and engaging experience. Critics like Guardian and Polygon also point out the minimal lore and storytelling in ARMS, highlighting the game's deficiency in providing a deep narrative or character development. Hardcore Gamer mentions that while there are brief backstories for each character in the Grand Prix campaign, the overall story remains simplistic and straightforward, lacking depth. Overall, the consensus among the critics is that ARMS prioritizes gameplay over story. COGconnected emphasizes that the game focuses on introducing players to its unique gameplay mechanics rather than delving into a complex narrative. While the lack of a detailed single-player storyline is a common criticism, the game's charm, quirky premise, and visually appealing characters are acknowledged as strengths. The general sentiment is that while ARMS may not offer a rich storytelling experience, it succeeds in providing an enjoyable and engaging gameplay experience that centers around its distinctive mechanics and character design.

The majority of critics praised the gameplay of ARMS for its unique and engaging mechanics. Many highlighted the game's innovative use of motion controls, diverse character abilities, and strategic depth. Critics like TrueGaming appreciated the various control options catering to different play styles, while Vandal commended the combination of simplicity for casual players and complexity for experts. The game's strategic depth, diverse arenas, and distinct abilities of fighters were also lauded by critics such as Critical Hit and Everyeye.it. Additionally, the interactive environments and unpredictability in battles were seen as enhancing the overall gameplay experience by reviewers like 3DJuegos. On the downside, some critics pointed out issues with the controls of ARMS. Gaming Age and Digital Spy mentioned frustrations with the motion controls, finding them ineffective against skilled competition or imprecise and frustrating, respectively. IGN Spain noted the limited variety in moves, which could impact the overall depth of the gameplay. The Washington Post highlighted the learning curve associated with mastering the motion controls as a potential challenge for players. The Jimquisition also criticized the flawed motion controls and standard button controls, which could create a disadvantage for controller players in competitive play. Overall, the consensus among critics leans heavily towards the positive side, with many praising ARMS for its unique and enjoyable gameplay experience. The game's mix of traditional fighting mechanics and motion controls, along with its depth, strategy, and variety of character abilities, were widely appreciated. Despite some concerns regarding control issues and learning curves, the majority of reviewers found ARMS to offer a fresh and engaging take on the fighting genre. The game's accessibility, strategic combat, and diverse gameplay modes contributed to its overall positive reception among critics, making it a recommended choice for players looking for a unique and tactical fighting experience.

The majority of critics praised the graphics and visual design of ARMS, highlighting its vibrant and colorful aesthetics, unique character designs, and detailed environments. Critics like GameSpew and Nintendo Life commended the engaging visuals with bright colors, wacky characters, and distinctive fighting arenas, while CGMagazine described the graphics as gorgeous, with bold colors and flawless animation. The game's art style was also lauded for being fun, quirky, and appealing, as mentioned by The Digital Fix and Digital Chumps. Additionally, the character designs were noted for their charm and personality, with Game Informer mentioning extravagant character designs and Wired UK praising the complex and detailed visuals. On the other hand, some critics pointed out certain drawbacks in the graphics and visual design of ARMS. Digitally Downloaded found the art direction garish and uninspiring, with environments lacking creative skill and bright, clashing colors causing discomfort. IBTimes UK mentioned that while the game features quirky character designs, some lack depth and originality, impacting their overall appeal. Gameblog.fr noted that while the visuals are colorful, the game falls short in establishing a truly distinctive identity. Furthermore, GameCrate highlighted beautifully futuristic arena designs but did not delve into strategic differences among them. Overall, the consensus among critics leans heavily towards positive feedback on the graphics and visual design of ARMS. The game is widely praised for its vibrant and appealing aesthetics, detailed character animations, and colorful designs that enhance the overall experience. The distinct and well-animated fighters, along with diverse and visually appealing arenas, contribute to creating a visually stunning and immersive world, as acknowledged by critics like USgamer and Vooks. While there were some criticisms regarding certain aspects of the visuals, the overwhelming sentiment is that ARMS excels in delivering a visually captivating and engaging experience that showcases Nintendo's design prowess and attention to detail.

The opinions of the critics regarding the Sound Design and Music of ARMS are overwhelmingly positive. Many critics praised the catchy and memorable music that complements the gameplay and enhances the overall experience. Critics like COGconnected and Critical Hit specifically highlighted the infectious and engaging nature of the soundtrack, with each stage featuring its own distinctive music that adds to the charm and atmosphere of the game. Additionally, reviewers such as Digital Chumps and Vooks appreciated how the sound design immerses players in the intense battles, enhancing the overall immersion and enjoyment of the game. The lively and upbeat music, along with well-done voice-over bits, were also mentioned by critics like Attack of the Fanboy and Switch Player, further emphasizing the positive impact of the sound design on the gameplay. On the other hand, some critics did point out certain negatives regarding the sound design and music of ARMS. The repetitive nature of the music was a common critique, with TheSixthAxis mentioning that reusing the same core hook on every stage could lead to frustration for some players. Additionally, Forbes noted that while the music was upbeat and catchy, it may become repetitive over time, potentially affecting the overall experience. The Guardian's criticism of the music as annoying also highlights a subjective aspect where individual preferences may vary regarding the game's audio elements. Overall, the consensus among the critics is that ARMS excels in its sound design and music, with the positives outweighing the negatives. The majority of reviewers appreciated the catchy and infectious nature of the soundtrack, as well as how it complements the gameplay and enhances the immersive experience of the game. Critics like USgamer and Vgames emphasized how the music ties the game together and adds to its overall appeal, while also praising the sound design for complementing the visuals and intensifying the battles. Despite some criticisms regarding repetitiveness, the general sentiment is that the sound design and music of ARMS contribute significantly to the game's charm and enjoyment, reflecting Nintendo's signature style and enhancing the overall experience for players.

Summary unavailable

In terms of technical performance on the Nintendo Switch, the majority of critics praised ARMS for its smooth gameplay experience. CGMagazine highlighted the flawless animation and stable frame rates on both TV and handheld mode, while Digital Chumps commended the effective motion controls and overall gameplay mechanics that contributed to a stable gaming experience. Additionally, Hardcore Gamer and TrueGaming noted the game's consistent 60fps performance, ensuring a seamless and competitive gameplay experience. Vgames also emphasized the smooth 60 frames per second gameplay, further solidifying the positive technical performance of ARMS on the Nintendo Switch. However, there were some criticisms regarding the technical performance of ARMS on the Nintendo Switch. GameCrate mentioned connection issues during online play, while Gamer.no pointed out precision issues with the Pro controller that could affect gameplay. Furthermore, GameOver.gr raised concerns about handling issues in online matches and the Grand Prix mode, impacting the overall experience for some players. Eurogamer Italy also noted that the stability of the online netcode was still being evaluated, indicating potential areas for improvement in the game's technical performance. Overall, the consensus among critics is overwhelmingly positive regarding the technical performance of ARMS across all platforms, particularly on the Nintendo Switch. The majority of reviewers highlighted the smooth gameplay, stable frame rates, and effective motion controls as key strengths of the game. Despite some minor issues such as connection problems and controller precision concerns, the overall sentiment leans towards a well-executed technical performance that enhances the player experience. Critics like EGM and The Digital Fix also noted the efficient online matchmaking and smooth gameplay, further reinforcing the positive reception of ARMS' technical performance among reviewers.

The opinions of several critics highlight the positive aspects of ARMS' replay value. Critics such as Cubed3 and NintendoWorldReport praise the variety of game modes and multiplayer options available in ARMS, enhancing the game's replayability. The strategic depth and different character abilities encourage experimentation and repeated playthroughs, keeping players engaged in the gameplay. The ability to unlock and upgrade different arms for characters, as mentioned by We Got This Covered, adds depth and longevity to the experience, providing lasting appeal for players. Additionally, the promise of future content updates, as noted by EGM, contributes to the positive aspects of ARMS' replay value, ensuring continued interest and engagement. On the other hand, several critics point out the negative aspects of ARMS' replay value. Critics like Impulsegamer and Gamer.no highlight the limited customization options, lack of content, and repetitive nature of the gameplay, impacting the overall replayability of the game. The lack of single-player content, as mentioned by Games.cz and Digitally Downloaded, and the feeling of some modes being like afterthoughts, as noted by Gamer.no, contribute to the negative aspects of ARMS' replay value. Additionally, the potential for content updates, as mentioned by Destructoid, may hint at an initial lack of substantial content that could affect the game's replayability in its current state. Overall, the consensus among critics regarding the replay value of ARMS is mixed. While some critics appreciate the variety of modes, multiplayer options, and strategic depth that enhance the game's replayability, others criticize the lack of content, limited customization options, and repetitive nature of the gameplay that may hinder long-term engagement. The promise of future updates and DLC, as highlighted by several critics, offers hope for potential improvements to address the game's shortcomings and enhance its replay value. Ultimately, the overall sentiment suggests that ARMS provides a unique and engaging multiplayer experience with room for growth and expansion to further solidify its replay value in the eyes of players and critics alike.