Attack on Titan

The opinions of the critics regarding the story of Attack on Titan are varied, but there are some common positive aspects that stand out. Many critics praise the game for faithfully following the events of the first season of the anime, allowing players to experience the key moments and major arcs. GameGrin, Game Revolution, and Easy Allies specifically mention that the game starts just like the anime and covers the struggle of humanity against the Titans. The game is also commended for its ability to introduce newcomers to the story. Arcade Sushi and COGconnected highlight the game's efforts to get players unfamiliar with the anime up to speed through loading screen slides and cutscenes that resemble the anime itself. NZGamer and Cheat Code Central appreciate the powerful truths and compelling backstories presented in the game's story. However, there are some negative aspects mentioned by the critics. GameWatcher, Destructoid, and Digitally Downloaded express concerns about the lack of originality or significant additions to the story. They feel that the game either retells the anime's story without offering anything valuable to fans or lacks depth and emotional connection to the characters. Slant Magazine criticizes the game for glossing over much of the plot and focusing primarily on the last sad cloister of humanity falling victim to a massive attack by the Titans. ICXM also points out that important plot points and political intrigue are skipped in the game. Overall, the critics' consensus is that Attack on Titan faithfully follows the story of the anime's first season, which is appreciated by fans of the series. The game is praised for its immersive and descriptive storytelling, as well as its ability to recreate the feel of the anime. While some critics mention the lack of originality or depth in the story, the majority of reviewers find the game to be an enjoyable adaptation that complements the show nicely. The positive aspects of the game's story, such as its faithful adaptation and powerful truths, outweigh the negatives mentioned by a few critics.

The majority of the critics praised the gameplay of Attack on Titan, with many comparing it to the exhilarating swinging mechanics of Spider-Man games. GameWatcher commends the fast, fluid, and fun mid-air combat mechanics, stating that swinging around, picking off Titan limbs, and going in for the killing blow is a ton of fun. Arcade Sushi also highlights the enjoyment of swinging around the city like Spider-Man, latching onto Titans with hooks, and killing them with one slice. COGconnected mentions the responsive controls and fluid movement, particularly praising the Three Dimensional Maneuver Gear. NZGamer describes the 3D Manoeuvre Gear as a joy to use, making it simple to whizz about and strike Titans. The gameplay's focus on mobility and strategy in combat against the Titans is also appreciated by Twinfinite. However, there are some criticisms regarding the gameplay. CGMagazine states that the fighting of Titans becomes simple and repetitive, leading to boredom after a few missions. Destructoid mentions that manipulating the camera can be frustrating, and God is a Geek notes that the gameplay can get repetitive, with some annoying missions. Push Square points out that while the controls are initially complex, they become easy to master, but the lack of variety in gameplay leads to repetition over time. Overall, the consensus among the critics is that the gameplay of Attack on Titan is very good. The fast-paced, precise combat, the joy of swinging and maneuvering with the Omni-Directional Gear, and the strategic considerations such as resource and squad management are all praised. The gameplay captures the essence of the series' omni-directional mobility gear and offers a unique and satisfying combat system. The positive opinions of GameWatcher, Arcade Sushi, COGconnected, NZGamer, Twinfinite, and many others highlight the enjoyment and excitement of the gameplay. While there are some criticisms regarding repetitive combat and frustrating camera controls, the overall sentiment is that the gameplay of Attack on Titan is a major strength of the game.

The opinions of the critics regarding the Graphics and Visual Design of Attack on Titan are generally positive. Many critics praise the game for faithfully recreating the look and feel of the anime, with character models closely resembling their animated counterparts. GameRevolution and Arcade Sushi specifically mention that the game faithfully recreates the anime's visual style and looks just like the anime. The visuals effectively portray the monstrous Titans, and the cutscenes are described as fluid, expressive, and visually appealing by DarkZero and Push Square. Additionally, the game is commended for capturing the soul of the Attack on Titan anime and immersing players into every scene, as stated by Twinfinite. However, there are some criticisms regarding the graphics and visual design of Attack on Titan. Some critics mention technical limitations, such as occasional dips in frame rate and visual pop-in. God is a Geek and ICXM highlight performance issues, frame rate drops, and motion blur. Wccftech and Impulsegamer note that while the graphics faithfully represent the series' main characters and iconic Titans, they are not particularly impressive. The lack of variety in enemy design is also mentioned by Slant Magazine. Overall, the consensus among the critics is that Attack on Titan successfully captures the look and feel of the anime. The game is praised for its faithful recreation of the anime's visual style, with character models and cutscenes resembling their animated counterparts. The large-scale environments and impressive visuals are also highlighted by Easy Allies. However, there are some technical limitations and performance issues that detract from the overall experience. Despite these drawbacks, the majority of critics agree that Attack on Titan's Graphics and Visual Design effectively bring the world of the anime to life.

The opinions of the critics regarding the Sound Design and Music of Attack on Titan are mixed, with both positive and negative aspects being highlighted. Several critics, such as Easy Allies and NZGamer, praise the game for its impressive original score and solid sound design that captures the feel of the Attack on Titan franchise. The original Japanese voice cast is also commended for providing consistency across mediums, as mentioned by NZGamer and Push Square. Additionally, XboxAddict specifically praises the voice acting and musical score, giving it a high rating of 9.0 out of 10. However, there are also some negative opinions expressed by critics. CGMagazine and God is a Geek express disappointment in the lack of the original score by Sawano, which is considered a major letdown for many fans. DarkZero and Gaming Nexus also mention the absence of iconic music from the series, such as the chart-topping opening song, as a missed opportunity. Stevivor highlights the frustration and distraction caused by the lack of an English voice cast and reliance on subtitles during gameplay. Overall, the consensus among the critics is that while the game's sound design and music have their strengths, there are also notable shortcomings. The absence of the original score and iconic music from the series is a recurring disappointment for many reviewers. On the positive side, the original Japanese voice cast and solid sound design are praised for their contribution to capturing the essence of the Attack on Titan franchise. The voice acting and musical score also receive commendation from XboxAddict. However, the lack of an English voice cast and reliance on subtitles during gameplay is seen as a drawback by Stevivor. Despite these mixed opinions, the overall sentiment leans towards disappointment in the sound design and music of Attack on Titan.

The overall sentiment regarding the voice acting in Attack on Titan is predominantly positive. Critics such as CGMagazine, COGconnected, NZGamer, Push Square, Wccftech, Impulsegamer, and XboxAddict all praise the voice acting, specifically highlighting the use of the original Japanese voice actors from the anime. They commend the consistency and quality of the performances, stating that the voice acting is impeccable, on par with the anime, and that the cast didn't miss a beat. This positive feedback indicates that the voice acting successfully captures the essence of the characters and maintains the authenticity of the Attack on Titan franchise. However, there are a couple of critics who express some concerns about the voice acting. Easy Allies mentions that the game only includes the Japanese dub with English subtitles, making it difficult to focus on character interactions during gameplay. This limitation may be disappointing for players who prefer an English dub or have difficulty following subtitles while engaging in gameplay. Additionally, God is a Geek notes that the lack of an English dub may disappoint fans of the English version of the anime. These concerns highlight the absence of an English voice acting option, which could potentially alienate a portion of the fanbase. Overall, the consensus among the critics is that the voice acting in Attack on Titan is praiseworthy. The use of the original Japanese voice cast is seen as a positive aspect, providing consistency across mediums and pleasing fans of the anime. The majority of reviewers appreciate the quality and authenticity of the performances, with some even stating that the voice acting is on par with the anime. While there are a few concerns about the absence of an English dub, these criticisms do not overshadow the overall positive sentiment towards the voice acting.

In terms of the technical performance, Attack on Titan received mixed opinions across different gaming platforms. Starting with the positives, the PC version of the game was praised for its great graphics and solid performance, with no framerate issues reported by GameGrin and GameWatcher. On the PS4, CGMagazine and COGconnected mentioned minor framerate drops and glitches, but they did not significantly impact the overall enjoyment of the game. Gaming Age also noted that the game ran at a solid 60fps with no frame drops on the PS4. Moving on to the negatives, several critics pointed out performance issues on the PS4. DarkZero mentioned occasional framerate dips and frustration due to cluttered screens and controls. Game Revolution mentioned constant framerate slowdowns during intense battles with multiple Titans. God is a Geek criticized the game for variable frame rate drops and an annoying amount of motion blur that cannot be turned off. NZGamer highlighted technical limitations with Titans walking into walls and popping into the environment. ICXM reported low-quality shadows, texture issues, and noticeable pop-in on the Xbox One version. Overall, the consensus among the critics is that while Attack on Titan generally performs well, there are some technical issues on all gaming platforms. The PS4 version seems to have the most notable performance problems, including framerate drops, camera issues, wonky AI behavior, and clipping. However, it is worth noting that some critics, such as Gaming Nexus and Push Square, mentioned that the game runs smoothly without many hitches. The PC version, on the other hand, received positive feedback for its solid port and excellent performance, although the lack of an in-game option to enable V-Sync was criticized by GameWatcher. Despite the technical issues, the game seemed to hold up well overall, as mentioned by DarkZero and Twinfinite.

The opinions of the critics regarding the replay value of Attack on Titan are mixed. Some critics, such as COGconnected and Gaming Nexus, highlight the game's replayability through the use of different characters and online multiplayer modes. These additions provide opportunities for late-game improvement and shared resources between offline and online portions of the game. Additionally, the inclusion of side activities, unlockables, gear upgrades, and additional rewards, as mentioned by DarkZero, adds to the replay value. On the other hand, several critics express concerns about the repetitive nature of the gameplay. GameWatcher, Arcade Sushi, GameCritics, and TheSixthAxis all mention the game becoming repetitive over time, which can weigh on the player's motivation to continue playing. The lack of mission variety and uninspired maps, as noted by Wccftech, also contribute to the repetitive nature of the game. Some critics, like GameGrin and Easy Allies, mention that the side missions and grinding required to progress can become tedious and monotonous. Overall, the consensus among the critics is that while Attack on Titan offers some replay value through its multiplayer modes, unlockables, and additional missions, the repetitive gameplay and lack of depth limit its overall replayability. Critics like CGMagazine and Gaming Age mention that hardcore fans of the anime might find the game worth purchasing despite its flaws. However, the majority of critics, including Game Revolution, Push Square, and The Jimquisition, express concerns about the repetitive nature of the gameplay and the limited variety in missions, which may lead to players losing interest before completing the game.