Mario vs. Donkey Kong

The story of Mario vs. Donkey Kong has received a mix of positive feedback from critics. CGMagazine describes the story as genuinely bizarre, irreverent, and hilarious, providing a foundation for the gameplay. Daily Star appreciates the simple premise of Mario chasing after Donkey Kong to recover stolen toys. Eurogamer Poland provides a detailed overview of the storyline, highlighting the conflict between Mario, the toy factory boss, and Donkey Kong, who steals Mini Mario figurines due to his obsession with them. This setup sets the stage for Mario's pursuit of the mischievous gorilla, adding depth to the narrative. On the downside, some critics find the story to be overly simplistic and lacking in depth. Gamingbible mentions that the story is not extensively discussed in the review, indicating a potential lack of emphasis on narrative development. While the premise of Mario rescuing his mechanical brothers from Donkey Kong, as mentioned by GAMES.CH, is engaging, it may not offer significant complexity for players seeking a more intricate storyline. Additionally, Metro GameCentral notes that the plot is straightforward, with Mario pursuing Donkey Kong across various locations after the theft of Mini-Marios, suggesting a lack of narrative surprises or twists. Overall, the consensus among critics is that the story of Mario vs. Donkey Kong serves its purpose effectively within the context of the game. While the narrative may be simple and straightforward, it sets the stage for the gameplay mechanics and provides a cohesive structure for players to engage with. Critics like Game Informer and Nintendo Insider appreciate the basic premise of Mario chasing down Donkey Kong to retrieve stolen Mini Marios, aligning with the arcade-style gameplay of the title. The story's light-hearted and classic rivalry between Mario and Donkey Kong, as highlighted by Nintendo Life and Nintenduo, resonates well with the game's overall tone and appeals to fans of the series. In conclusion, while the story may not be groundbreaking, it successfully complements the gameplay experience and captures the essence of the Mario vs. Donkey Kong franchise.

The majority of critics praised the gameplay of Mario vs. Donkey Kong, highlighting its engaging puzzle-solving and platforming elements. Critics like Checkpoint Gaming and Eurogamer Poland appreciated the tight and fair gameplay, with a natural difficulty progression that kept players challenged but not frustrated. The varied gameplay loop, as noted by Stevivor, added complexity to the levels, requiring good spatial reasoning skills and introducing unique twists like picking up items and enemies. The mix of challenges and rewards in the level design, as mentioned by IGN Italia and Pure Nintendo, offered a satisfying and enjoyable experience for players. On the downside, some critics pointed out issues with the control scheme and collision detection. Slant Magazine noted that while the levels were elegantly designed with new obstacles, these technical aspects were lacking. IGN Adria mentioned that the movement felt slow and sluggish, reminiscent of older Mario games, which could potentially impact the overall gameplay experience for some players. Voxel highlighted that the precision required in certain levels could lead to frustrating mistakes and frequent deaths, especially for beginners, despite the casual mode being available to mitigate this. Overall, the consensus among critics is overwhelmingly positive regarding the gameplay of Mario vs. Donkey Kong. The game successfully blends platforming and puzzle-solving elements, offering a challenging yet enjoyable experience for players of all ages and skill levels. Critics appreciated the variety of challenges, unique level designs, and the introduction of new features like co-op mode and different gameplay modes. Despite some minor technical issues, the engaging gameplay loop, satisfying puzzles, and rewarding platforming sections make Mario vs. Donkey Kong a standout title in the puzzle-platformer genre.

The majority of critics praised the graphics and visual design of Mario vs. Donkey Kong, highlighting various positive aspects. CGMagazine commended the game for its complete graphical overhaul, detailed levels, toy-like enemies, and improved character animations. COGconnected also lauded the visuals, describing them as slick, modern, with polished character models and environments. Additionally, GamingBolt noted the thorough presentation overhaul that upgraded the visuals to create a pleasant-looking game on the Nintendo Switch. These critics, among others, appreciated the vibrant colors, detailed environments, and expressive character animations that contributed to a visually stunning experience. On the other hand, some critics pointed out certain negatives regarding the graphics and visual design of Mario vs. Donkey Kong. Checkpoint Gaming mentioned that while the graphics and sounds were updated from the original game, they lacked a unique charismatic flair. Eurogamer expressed disappointment that the original pre-rendered faux-3D models were replaced with standard modern Mario graphics, missing the quirky charm of the original design. Slant Magazine also noted that while the levels were visually impressive, there was a lack of modernization in certain aspects, potentially impacting the overall visual experience for some players. Overall, despite some minor criticisms, the consensus among the critics is overwhelmingly positive regarding the graphics and visual design of Mario vs. Donkey Kong. Eurogamer Poland praised the game for offering improved visuals compared to the original Game Boy Advance version, capturing the charm of the Mario universe with colorful and vibrant characters and environments. The majority of critics appreciated the modernized visuals, vibrant New Super Mario Bros-style graphics, and CGI cutscenes that enhanced the visual experience. The blend of nostalgia with contemporary elements, as noted by Gfinity, created a visually appealing and charming aesthetic that resonated well with fans of the Mario franchise. In conclusion, the positive reception from the majority of critics indicates that the graphics and visual design of Mario vs. Donkey Kong are a significant strength of the game, contributing to its overall enjoyment and appeal.

The opinions of the critics regarding the Sound Design and Music of Mario vs. Donkey Kong are overwhelmingly positive. Several critics praised the game for its revamped and reworked soundtrack, with live instrumentals and orchestral arrangements that enhance the overall experience. Critics like CGMagazine, Dot Esports, and KeenGamer specifically highlighted the charming and immersive nature of the music, with jazz influences and catchy tunes that complement the gameplay. The inclusion of iconic voice acting by Charles Martinet for Mario, as mentioned by Nintendo Insider and Worth Playing, also adds to the positive reception of the audio presentation. On the other hand, some critics did point out certain drawbacks in the sound design of the game. God is a Geek mentioned that while the audio and visuals are excellent, the main level select audio can become repetitive and annoying, indicating a lack of variety in certain aspects of the sound design. Worth Playing also noted that while the soundtrack is serviceable, it does not stand out as exceptional, suggesting a missed opportunity to create a more memorable audio experience for players. Overall, the consensus among the critics is that the Sound Design and Music of Mario vs. Donkey Kong are strong points of the game. The majority of reviewers appreciated the efforts put into revamping the soundtrack, incorporating live performances, jazz influences, and orchestral arrangements to elevate the gameplay experience. The positive comments from critics like Metro GameCentral, Nintenduo, and The Enemy emphasize the impact of the music in setting the tone, enhancing immersion, and symbolizing the rivalry between Mario and Donkey Kong. While there were some minor criticisms regarding repetitive audio elements and the lack of standout tracks, the general sentiment leans towards the audio presentation being a significant asset that contributes positively to the overall enjoyment of the game.

The voice acting in Mario vs. Donkey Kong received mixed reviews from critics. Inverse appreciated the charm added by the toy mini-Marios' voice-acting lines, finding their interactions with Mario enjoyable despite occasional frustrations. KeenGamer highlighted the authenticity and charm brought by Charles Martinet reprising his role as Mario, contributing positively to the game's overall experience. Nintendo Insider also acknowledged Martinet's contribution to the voice acting, emphasizing his presence in the game. However, not all critics were entirely satisfied with the voice acting in the game. Twinfinite expressed disappointment that most of the charming voicework from the original did not carry over to the remake, indicating a missed opportunity to maintain the game's appeal through voice acting. The Enemy's review, while mentioning Martinet's role as Mario, lacked a deeper evaluation of the voice acting, leaving room for uncertainty regarding the overall quality and impact of the performances. Overall, the consensus among critics leans towards the positive side, with a focus on Charles Martinet's portrayal of Mario as a key highlight. While there were some missed opportunities and areas for improvement noted by critics like Twinfinite, the general sentiment suggests that the voice acting, particularly Martinet's contribution, added to the game's charm and authenticity. The mix of appreciation for the voice work alongside some critiques indicates a nuanced reception of the voice acting in Mario vs. Donkey Kong, ultimately contributing to the game's overall appeal and immersive experience.

In terms of technical performance on the Nintendo Switch, the majority of critics praised Mario vs. Donkey Kong for its smooth and stable gameplay experience. Critics like GGRecon, KeenGamer, and My Nintendo News highlighted the game's flawless 60fps performance with no framerate drops or glitches. Nintenduo and Nintendo Life also commended the game for running smoothly in both docked and handheld modes, ensuring a consistent experience for players. Additionally, Siliconera mentioned quality of life improvements such as multiple save files and improved level navigation, indicating a strong technical foundation. On the flip side, some critics did point out specific issues related to the game's technical performance on the Nintendo Switch. Dot Esports and Slant Magazine highlighted frustrations with controls, precision, and collision detection in certain levels. Stevivor and TheSixthAxis mentioned problems with Mario's responsiveness and nimbleness, particularly in challenging levels, which could lead to player deaths. The Enemy specifically noted an issue with Mario's grabbing mechanics in the air, causing frustration and the need to restart sections. These criticisms suggest that while the game generally performs well on the Switch, there are areas where technical improvements could enhance the overall experience for players. Overall, the consensus among critics regarding the technical performance of Mario vs. Donkey Kong on the Nintendo Switch leans towards the positive side. The game is lauded for its smooth performance, crisp imagery, and attention to detail, as highlighted by KeenGamer and Nintenduo. While there are mentions of control issues and uneven difficulty from critics like Dot Esports and Jeuxvideo.com, the general sentiment is that the game delivers a polished and visually appealing experience on the Switch. Worth Playing's lack of mention of technical issues further reinforces the notion that the game provides a generally stable and enjoyable gameplay experience for players on this platform.

In terms of positives regarding the Replay Value of Mario vs. Donkey Kong, several critics highlighted the game's additional challenges, modes, and content that enhance replayability. Eurogamer and Eurogamer Poland praised the inclusion of time attacks, expert levels, and bonus levels unlocked by collecting presents, providing players with incentives to revisit levels. GameSpot and Nintendo Insider also commended the game for offering new worlds, expert stages, and a two-player co-op mode, adding variety and depth to the gameplay experience. Additionally, Pure Nintendo mentioned the secondary objective of collecting gifts within each level as a way to increase replay value, catering to completionist players. On the flip side, some critics pointed out limitations and negatives affecting the game's replay value. Gfinity noted that the repetitive structure and lack of significant differences between worlds could hinder long-term replayability, especially for experienced players seeking more challenging content. Dot Esports highlighted that while the game may not be considered a must-play for everyone, fans of the original and those who appreciate refined puzzle design will still find enjoyment, indicating a potential lack of broad appeal in terms of replay value. Slant Magazine also mentioned limited replay value due to simplicity and lack of new material, suggesting that the game may not offer enough fresh content to keep players engaged over multiple playthroughs. Overall, the consensus among critics leans towards Mario vs. Donkey Kong offering decent to good replay value, with a variety of additional challenges, modes, and content contributing to the game's longevity. Positive aspects such as the inclusion of new worlds, expert levels, time attack modes, and co-op gameplay were highlighted by critics like Game Informer, Nintenderos, and Vooks, showcasing the diverse range of features that cater to different player preferences and playstyles. While some critics noted limitations in terms of repetitive gameplay or lack of broad appeal, the general sentiment suggests that the game provides enough content and incentives for players to revisit levels, engage in cooperative play, and tackle additional challenges, ultimately enhancing the overall replay value of Mario vs. Donkey Kong.